I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2019/C 82/17)
Language of the case: Slovak
Appellant: DHL Logistics (Slovakia), spol. s r.o.
Respondent: Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky
Must the wording of Combined Nomenclature subheading 8525 80 91 set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1) of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff resulting from the Explanatory Notes published pursuant to that regulation in 2011 (2) be interpreted as meaning that goods such as the digital video camera recorders at issue in the present case may also be classified under that subheading even though they are capable of capturing and recording video images only of a quality of less than 800 x 600 pixels, specifically, 720 x 576 pixels, given that their other function — the capturing and recording of still images — is limited to a still image quality of 1 600 x 1 200 pixels (1,92 megapixels)?
(1) OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1.
(2) OJ 2011 C 137, p. 1.