EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-163/12: Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2015 — Ternavsky v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Belarus — Freezing of funds — Restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union — Error of assessment)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TA0163

62012TA0163

May 12, 2015
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

29.6.2015

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/26

(Case T-163/12) (<span class="super">1</span>)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Belarus - Freezing of funds - Restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union - Error of assessment))

(2015/C 213/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Anatoly Ternavsky (Moscow, Russia) (represented initially by C. Raspin and E. Van den Haute, lawyers, subsequently by G. Berrisch, A. Polcyn, lawyers, and N. Chesaites, Barrister, and lastly by G. Berrisch)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Naert and M.-M. Joséphidès, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Council Implementing Decision 2012/171/CFSP of 23 March 2012 implementing Decision 2010/639/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ 2012 L 87, p. 95), of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 265/2012 of 23 March 2012 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2012 L 87, p. 37), of Council Decision 2013/534/CFSP of 29 October 2013 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ 2013 L 288, p. 69), of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1054/2013 of 29 October 2013 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2013 L 288, p. 1), of Council Implementing Decision 2014/24/CFSP of 20 January 2014 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ 2014 L 16, p. 32), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 46/2014 of 20 January 2014 implementing Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2014 L 16, p. 3) in so far as they concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls Council Implementing Decision 2012/171/CFSP of 23 March 2012 implementing Decision 2010/639/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 265/2012 of 23 March 2012 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus, Council Decision 2013/534/CFSP of 29 October 2013 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1054/2013 of 29 October 2013 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus in so far as they concern Mr Anatoly Ternavsky;

2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3.Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay one-half of those incurred by Mr Ternavsky in the present proceedings;

4.Orders Mr Ternavsky to bear other half of his own costs in the present proceedings and to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Council in the application for interim measures.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 157, 2.6.2012.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia