EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-584/24: Action brought on 13 November 2024 – Tkach v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0584

62024TN0584

November 13, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/399

27.1.2025

(Case T-584/24)

(C/2025/399)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Oleg Polikarpovich Tkach (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: É. Épron and C. Gimbert, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

declare the present action for annulment admissible and well founded;

annul in part Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2456 of 12 September 2024 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, and therefore Decision 2014/145/CFSP, in so far as they concern the applicant;

annul in part Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2455 of 12 September 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, and therefore Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in so far as they concern the applicant;

order the Council of the European Union to pay all the costs and expenses of the proceedings;

reserve to the applicant all other rights, entitlements, pleas and actions.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging an error of assessment.

2.Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the principle of proportionality.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/399/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia