EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-1099/23: Action brought on 24 November 2023 — Rodríguez Ruiz v EUIPO — Scherer (LEMOON)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN1099

62023TN1099

November 24, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2024/964

29.1.2024

(Case T-1099/23)

(C/2024/964)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Ruiz (Albelda de Iregua, Spain) (represented by: J. Pérez Itarte, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Markus Scherer (Mannheim, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark LEMOON — Application for registration No 18 183 606

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 July 2023 in Case R 352/2023-5

Forms of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul/revoke the contested decision and refuse registration of European Union trade mark No 18 183 606 LEMOON for the designated goods in Classes 32 and 33;

order EUIPO and the intervener (if he appears and intervenes in the present action) to pay the costs, including those of the proceedings before the Opposition Division of the Operations Department and before the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO;

in the alternative, and in the event that this action is dismissed in part by the General Court, revoke the contested decision in so far as it orders the applicant to pay the costs incurred in the administrative proceedings before EUIPO (EUR 1 570).

Pleas in law

Infringement of Articles 68, 94 and 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and lack of defence;

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia