- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-12/21 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 13 April 2021 — PJ v EIT (Application for interim relief — Civil service — Measures for the organisation of work during the health crisis — Prohibition of teleworking outside the country of employment — Application for an exemption — Refusal decision — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Application for interim measures — Urgency — Prima facie case — Balancing of interests)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0012
62021TB0012
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 242/48
(Case T-12/21 R)
(Application for interim relief - Civil service - Measures for the organisation of work during the health crisis - Prohibition of teleworking outside the country of employment - Application for an exemption - Refusal decision - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Application for interim measures - Urgency - Prima facie case - Balancing of interests)
(2021/C 242/68)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: PJ (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)
Defendant: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (represented by: P. Juanes Burgos, acting as Agent, and by A. Duron, lawyer)
Re:
APPLICATION under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for (i) the suspension of operation of the decision of the EIT of 17 December 2020 to refuse the applicant’s request to telework from her place of origin and (ii) an order that EIT should authorise her to telework from her place of origin until restrictions relating to the health crisis imposed by the German and Hungarian national authorities are lifted.
Operative part of the order
1.The operation of the decision of the Director of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) of 17 December 2020, refusing PJ’s request to telework from her place of origin, is suspended.
2.The EIT shall authorise PJ to telework from the place of residence of her children subject to this being justified by the circumstances relating to the COVID-19 pandemic and without prejudice to the requirement that PJ travel to her place of employment on an ad hoc basis for reasons relating to the interests of the service.
3.The costs are reserved.