I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Appeal - Law governing the institutions - European Parliament - Rules governing expenses and allowances for Members of Parliament - Parliamentary assistance allowance - Recovery of sums unduly paid - Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to be heard - Right of access to the file - Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 - Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the European Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies - Article 9 - Transmissions of personal data to recipients established in the European Union other than Union institutions and bodies - Article 26 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union)
(C/2025/4549)
Language of the case: Lithuanian
Appellant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker, N. Görlitz, J.-C. Puffer and S. Toliušis, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings: TC (represented by: D. Aukštuolytė-Kapp, advokatė)
The Court:
1.Sets aside points 2 and 3 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 7 June 2023, TC v Parliament (T-309/21, EU:T:2023:315);
2.Dismisses the first and second pleas in law in the action before the General Court of the European Union;
3.Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union for judgment on the third to fifth pleas in law;
4.Reserves the costs.
—
(1) OJ C, C/2023/17.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4549/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—