EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-801/22: Order of the General Court of 14 November 2023 — 3M v EUIPO (Representation of two parallel luminous yellow bands separated by a silver grey band with transparent parallel slanted lines running through the three bands) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark representing two parallel luminous yellow bands separated by a silver grey band with transparent parallel slanted lines running through the three bands — Absolute ground for refusal — Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result — Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TB0801

62022TB0801

November 14, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/745

(Case T-801/22) (*)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark representing two parallel luminous yellow bands separated by a silver grey band with transparent parallel slanted lines running through the three bands - Absolute ground for refusal - Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result - Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(C/2024/745)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: 3M Company (Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States) (represented by: T. de Haan and S. Vandezande, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 11 October 2022 (Case R 1151/2018-1).

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed.

2.3M Company and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall each bear their own costs.

(*)

Language of the case: English.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/745/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia