- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-536/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2022 — LU v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Dignity at Work Policy — Psychological harassment — Investigation procedure — Action for annulment — Final report of the investigation panel — Preparatory act — Inadmissibility — Decision rejecting the complaint — Act adversely affecting an official — Admissibility — Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Liability)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0536
62020TA0536
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.3.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 128/21
(Case T-536/20) (*)
(Civil service - EIB staff - Dignity at Work Policy - Psychological harassment - Investigation procedure - Action for annulment - Final report of the investigation panel - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility - Decision rejecting the complaint - Act adversely affecting an official - Admissibility - Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Rights of the defence - Right to be heard - Obligation to state reasons - Liability)
(2022/C 128/29)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: LU (represented by: B. Maréchal, lawyer)
Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Faedo and K. Carr, acting as Agents, and by J. Currall and B. Wägenbaur, lawyers)
Re:
Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU and to Article 50a(1) of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking, first, in essence, annulment of the final report issued by the Dignity at Work Panel on 13 May 2020 and of the decision of the President of the EIB of 26 May 2020 rejecting the harassment complaint lodged by the applicant and, second, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the President of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 26 May 2020 rejecting the harassment complaint made by LU;
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders the EIB to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
ECLI:EU:C:2022:140