EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-687/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Alicante (Spain) lodged on 7 November 2022 — Julieta, Rogelio v Agencia Estatal de Administración Tributaria

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0687

62022CN0687

November 7, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

27.3.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/15

(Case C-687/22)

(2023/C 112/20)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Julieta, Rogelio

Respondent: Agencia Estatal de Administración Tributaria

Questions referred

(i)Is it possible to apply the principle that national law must be interpreted in conformity with EU law to Article 23(4) of [Directive (EU) 2019/1023 (1)] where the facts (as in the present case, in view of the date of the application for discharge of debt) occurred during the period between the entry into force of the directive and the deadline for its transposition, and the applicable national legislation (the consolidated text of the Ley Concursal (Insolvency Law), as amended by Royal Legislative Decree 1/2020) is not the legislation which transposes the directive (Law 16/22)?

(ii)Is national legislation, such as the Spanish legislation established in the consolidated text of the Insolvency Law (as amended by Royal Legislative Decree 1/2020), which provides no justification for excluding claims governed by public law from discharge of debt, compatible with Article 23(4) of the directive and its underlying principles concerning discharge of debt? In so far as that legislation excludes claims governed by public law from discharge of debt and is not duly justified, does it compromise or jeopardise the attainment of the objectives established in the directive?

(iii)Does Article 23(4) of the directive contain an exhaustive, closed list of categories of claims which can be excluded from discharge, or is the list instead merely illustrative, with the national legislature enjoying absolute discretion to establish such categories of excludable claims as it sees fit, provided that they are duly justified under national law?

(1) Directive (EU) 2019/1023 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on preventive restructuring frameworks, on discharge of debt and disqualifications, and on measures to increase the efficiency of procedures concerning restructuring, insolvency and discharge of debt, and amending Directive (EU) 2017/1132 (Directive on restructuring and insolvency) (OJ 2019 L 172, p. 18).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia