I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2022/C 213/29)
Language of the case: Romanian
Appellant: NR
Other party: Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Craiova
Is the ne bis in idem principle, as guaranteed by Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in conjunction with Romania’s obligations to address the benchmarks set out in the CVM decision (Commission Decision 2006/928), to be interpreted as meaning that a decision to take no further action, issued by the public prosecutor after obtaining essential evidence in the case, precludes another public prosecution from being brought against the same person, for the same acts, albeit with a different legal classification, since that decision is final — unless it is established that the circumstance on which the discontinuance was based does not exist, or new facts or circumstances have emerged which show that the circumstance on which the discontinuance was based no longer exists?