- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-42/17: Action brought on 25 January 2017 — VR-Bank Rhein-Sieg v SRB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0042
62017TN0042
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.3.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 78/38
(Case T-42/17)
(2017/C 078/52)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: VR-Bank Rhein-Sieg eG (Siegburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger and K. Rübsamen, lawyers)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 15 April 2016 on the ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund for 2016 (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06) and the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 20 May 2016 on the adjustment of the ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund for 2016, supplementing the decision of the Board of 15 April 2016 on the ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund for 2016 (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/13), in so far as the contested decisions affect the applicant’s contribution;
—order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-14/17, Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v SRB.