- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-349/24, Nuratau: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně – Czech Republic) – A.B. v Ministerstvo vnitra, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 3 – More favourable standards – Subsidiary protection – Reason that has no direct link with the situation in the country of origin – Rationale of international protection)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CA0349
62024CA0349
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/4023
28.7.2025
(Case C-349/24,
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Asylum policy - Refugee status or subsidiary protection status - Directive 2011/95/EU - Article 3 - More favourable standards - Subsidiary protection - Reason that has no direct link with the situation in the country of origin - Rationale of international protection)
(C/2025/4023)
Language of the case: Czech
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: A.B.
Defendant: Ministerstvo vnitra, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky
Operative part of the judgment
Article 3 of Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted
must be interpreted as precluding from being regarded as a more favourable standard, which may be adopted in accordance with that article, national legislation providing for the grant of subsidiary protection to a third-country national who, if removed to his or her country of origin, would face a real risk of suffering a breach of his or her right to private life on account of the severing of his or her links with the Member State examining the application for international protection.
—
(1) OJ C, C/2024/5073.
(2) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4023/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—