I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-333/14) (<a id="ntc1-C_2017121EN.01002901-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2017121EN.01002901-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Cancellation of the earlier figurative mark serving as a basis for the contested decision - No need to adjudicate)
(2017/C 121/42)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Andreas Helbrecht (Hilden, Germany) (represented by: C. König, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Rajh, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Lenci Calzature SpA (Turchetto-Montecarlo, Italy) (represented by: F. Celluprica and F. Fischetti, lawyers)
Action for annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 February 2014 (Case R 830/2013-5), concerning opposition proceedings between Lenci Calzature and Mr Helbrecht.
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Lenci Calzature SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Mr Andreas Helbrecht. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.
(<a id="ntr1-C_2017121EN.01002901-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017121EN.01002901-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> OJ C 235, 21.7.2014).