- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-95/12: Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2014 — Stols v Council (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2007 promotion procedure — Decision not to promote the interested party to grade AST 11 — Comparison of merits — Review by the court of the manifest error of assessment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TA0095
62012TA0095
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.2.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 52/34
(Case T-95/12) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2007 promotion procedure - Decision not to promote the interested party to grade AST 11 - Comparison of merits - Review by the court of the manifest error of assessment)
2014/C 52/61
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Willem Stols (Halsteren, Netherlands) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and A. Jensen, acting as Agents)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment delivered by the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) on 13 December 2011 in Case F-51/08 RENV, not yet published, seeking the setting aside of that judgment.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Mr Willem Stols to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union in the context the appeal proceedings.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2014052EN.01003401-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2014052EN.01003401-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 126, 28.4.2012.