- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-369/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 31 July 2014 — Sommer Antriebs- und Funktechnik GmbH v Rademacher Geräte-Elektronik GmbH & Co. KG
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CN0369
62014CN0369
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.12.2014
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 439/15
(Case C-369/14)
(2014/C 439/22)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Sommer Antriebs- und Funktechnik GmbH
Defendant: Rademacher Geräte-Elektronik GmbH & Co. KG
Questions referred
1)Must Articles 2(1) and 3(a) of, and Annexes IA and IB to, Directive 2002/96/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment and/or Articles 2(1)(a) and 3(1)(a) of, and Annexes I and II to, Directive 2012/19/EU (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment be interpreted as meaning that operating devices for (garage) doors with an electric voltage of approximately 220 to 240 volts, which are designed to be incorporated into the building structure together with the (garage) door, come within the concept of electrical and electronic equipment, in particular the concept of electrical and electronic tools?
2)If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative: Must Annex IA, No 6, and Annex IB, No 6, to Directive 2002/96/EC and/or Article 3(1)(b) of, and Annex I, No 6, and Annex II, No 6, to, Directive 2012/19/EU be interpreted as meaning that (garage-door) operating devices, as referred to in Question (1), are to be regarded as components of large-scale stationary industrial tools within the meaning of those provisions?
3)If the answer to Question (1) is in the affirmative and the answer to Question (2) is in the negative: Must Article 2(1) of Directive 2002/96/EC and/or Article 2(3)(b) of Directive 2012/19/EU be interpreted as meaning that (garage-door) operating devices, as referred to in Question (1), are to be regarded as part of another type of equipment which does not fall within the scope of those directives?
(1) Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) — Joint declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission relating to Article 9, OJ 2002 L 37, p. 24.
(2) OJ 2012 L 197, p. 38.