I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Case C-61/23,
Ekostroy)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Road transport - Tax provisions - Directive 1999/62/EC - Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures - Penalties applicable to infringements of the national provisions adopted under that directive - Article 9a - Requirement of proportionality - National legislation penalising all offences by means of a flat-rate fine)
(C/2025/233)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Applicant: ‘Еkоstroy’ EOOD
Respondent: Agentsia ‘Patna infrastruktura’
Interested party: Okrazhna prokuratura – Haskovo
Article 9a of Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 1999 on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures, as amended by Directive 2011/76/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2011,
must be interpreted as meaning that the requirement of proportionality to which it refers precludes a system of penalties that provides for the imposition of a flat-rate fine or financial penalty for all offences, whatever their nature and gravity, under the rules on the obligation to make prior payment of the toll for use of a road infrastructure, including where that system provides for the possibility of being exempted from administrative criminal liability by paying a flat-rate ‘redress charge’.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/233/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
* Language of the case: Bulgarian.