- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-218/20: Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2021 — Alkattan v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to a fair trial — Error of assessment — Determination of listing criteria)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0218
62020TA0218
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 11/24
(Case T-218/20) (*)
(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against Syria - Freezing of funds - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Right to a fair trial - Error of assessment - Determination of listing criteria)
(2022/C 11/32)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Waseem Alkattan (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: G. Karouni, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Limonet and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents)
Re:
First, application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2020/212 of 17 February 2020 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2020 L 431, p. 6), Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/211 of 17 February 2020 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2020 L 431, p. 1), Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/719 of 28 May 2020 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2020 L 168, p. 66), and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/848 of 27 May 2021 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2021 L 188, p. 18), in so far as those measures concern the applicant, and, secondly, application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the harm suffered by the applicant as a result of those measures.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Waseem Alkattan to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: French.
ECLI:EU:C:2025:140
15