- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-704/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 23 December 2020 — Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v C, B
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CN0704
62020CN0704
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.4.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 128/10
(Case C-704/20)
(2021/C 128/14)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid
Respondents: C, B
Question referred
Does European Union law, more particularly Article 15(2) of the Return Directive (2008/115/EC; OJ 2008 L 348) and Article 9 of the Reception Directive (2013/33/EU; OJ 2013 L 180), read in conjunction with Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (OJ 2007 C 303/01), require a court of its own motion (ex officio) to assess whether all the conditions pertaining to detention have been met, including those where the foreign national has not disputed that compliance occurred, despite having had the opportunity to do so?
Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98).
Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 96).
Language of the case: Dutch
* * *
* Language of the case: Dutch.