I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2020/C 255/29)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Unger Marketing International LLC (Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States) (represented by: T. Huber and K. von Seydlitz-Brandl, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Orben Wasseraufbereitung GmbH & Co. KG (Wiesbaden, Germany)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Design at issue: European Union design No 2 555 425-0002
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 February 2020 in Case R 740/2018-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Unger,
—order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear the costs of the proceedings including those incurred by the applicant, in case the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal should become an intervening party in this case.
—Infringement of Article 8(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 65(1)(f) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.