- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-315/22: Action brought on 27 May 2022 — Yayla Türk v EUIPO — Marmara Import-Export (Sütat)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0315
62022TN0315
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.7.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 276/19
(Case T-315/22)
(2022/C 276/28)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Yayla Türk Lebensmittelvertrieb GmbH (Krefeld, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Marmara Import-Export GmbH (Ratingen, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Sütat’ — EU trade mark No 5 414 561
Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 March 2022 in Case R 1184/2021-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—reject Marmara Import-Export GmbH’s application of 17 June 2020 for a declaration of invalidity in respect of EU trade mark No 44 583 C; in the alternative: refer the case back to EUIPO for a further hearing and decision;
—order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of the right to be heard.