I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(2008/C 223/57)
Language of the case: French
Appellant: Leche Celta SL (represented by: J Calderón Chavero and T. Villate Consonni, lawyers)
Other party/parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade marks and Designs), Celia SA
—Annul the judgment of the Third Chamber of the Court of First Instance of 23 April 2008 in Case T-35/07 on the grounds that the marks CELIA/CELTA are clearly incompatible;
—Order payment of costs.
By its appeal the appellant challenges in essence the assessment made by the Court of First Instance on the similarity of the marks at issue. According to the appellant, the similarity of the two marks is such that the relevant public will not be able to detect any difference between them, the more so when the goods covered by them are identical. The Court therefore committed several errors of assessment by judging the degree of verbal and conceptual similarity between the marks at issue to be low.
—