- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-397/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Itzehoe (Germany) lodged on 23 July 2015 — Raiffeisen Privatbank Liechtenstein AG v Gerhild Lukath
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CN0397
62015CN0397
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.9.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 320/18
(Case C-397/15)
(2015/C 320/25)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Raiffeisen Privatbank Liechtenstein AG
Defendant: Gerhild Lukath
Other parties to the proceedings: Rüdiger Boy, Boy Finanzberatung GmbH, Christian Maibaum, Vienna-Life Lebensversicherungs AG, Frank Weber
Questions referred
1.Is the agreement between a bank and a consumer for the granting of credit, which is linked to an agreement to take out life assurance and an agreement for advising on and brokering a capital investment, which in turn serves as security for the credit amount, to be regarded as a contract for the supply of services within the meaning of Article 5(2) of the Rome Convention of 19 June 1980 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (1)?
2.Is Article 5(2) of the Rome Convention also applicable to cases in which advertising comes and/or contact is made from a county in which the consumer has his main place of residence, although he signs the agreements at his secondary place of residence, if the other party to the agreements or his agent received the consumer’s order in the State of the main place of residence?
(1) OJ 1980 L 266, p. 1.