I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: mobile.de GmbH (Dreilinden, Germany) (represented by: T. Lührig, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Droujestvo S Ogranichena Otgovornost ‘Rezon’ (Sofia, Bulgaria)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark mobile.ro — EU trade mark No 8 838 542
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 March 2018 in Case R 111/2015-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 18(1)(a), in conjunction with Article 64(2) and (3), of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 19(2) and Article 10(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625, in conjunction with Article 64(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 60(1)(a), in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) and 8(2)(a)(ii), of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 4(3) TEU, in conjunction with the legal principle laid down in Article 59(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and Article 61(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.