EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-1160/23: Action brought on 15 December 2023 — AS and Others v EEAS

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN1160

62023TN1160

December 15, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2024/1110

(Case T-1160/23)

(C/2024/1110)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: AS and 28 other applicants (represented by: A. Tymen, lawyer)

Defendant: European External Action Service

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

annul the decision of 21 December 2022 of the Director-General for Resource Management of the EEAS, bearing reference ADMIN(2022)76, fixing the allowance for living conditions for 2023 for Jordan at 10 %;

annul the decision of 7 September 2023 of the Secretary-General of the EEAS, bearing reference Ares(2023)6075736, rejecting the applicants’ complaint;

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law:

1.First plea in law, alleging the unlawfulness of the procedure followed in the process for fixing the allowance for living conditions for the year 2023, infringements of the guidelines establishing the methodology to fix the living conditions allowances and the granting of rest leave and infringement of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.

2.Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment, on the ground that the parameters ‘security’, ‘health and hospital environment’, ‘climate’, ‘degree of isolation’ and ‘other local living conditions’ were under-evaluated when awarding the score referred to in Article 1(2) of the aforementioned guidelines.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1110/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia