I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-405/10)(1)
((Approximation of laws - Deliberate release into the environment of GMOs - Marketing authorisation procedure - Request for internal review - Annulment of the contested decisions or the decisions concerned - Action devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))
(2014/C 431/33)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Association/Vereniging Justice & Environment (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: P. Černý, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by P. Olivier and D. Bianchi, and subsequently by D. Bianchi)
Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2010/135/EU of 2 March 2010 concerning the placing on the market, in accordance with Directive 200l/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, of a potato product (Solanum tuberosum L. line EH92-527-1) genetically modified for enhanced content of the amylopectin component of starch (OJ 2010 L 53, p. 11) and of Commission Decision 2010/136/EU of 2 March 2010 authorising the placing on the market of feed produced from the genetically modified potato EH92-527-1 (BPS-25271-9) and the adventitious or technically unavoidable presence of the potato in food and other feed products under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2010 L 53, p. 15), and of the decision allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter of 6 July 2010 rejecting the request for an internal review of those decisions.
1.There is no need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Commission is to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Association/Vereniging Justice & Environment.
(1)
OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.