- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-555/22: Action brought on 9 September 2022 — France v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0555
62022TN0555
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.10.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 408/42
(Case T-555/22)
(2022/C 408/56)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: French Republic (represented by: T. Stehelin, A. Daniel and E. Leclerc, acting as Agents)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the notice of Open Competition EPSO/AD/400/22, entitled ‘Administrators (AD 7) and experts (AD 9) in the fields of defence industry and space’ published on 16 June 2022 in the Official Journal of the European Union; (1)
—order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging the notice of Open Competition EPSO/AD/400/22, entitled ‘Administrators (AD 7) and experts (AD 9) in the fields of defence industry and space’ (‘the contested notice of competition’) creates discrimination that is based on language and which is not justified.
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the requirement to recruit officials of the highest standard of ability, efficiency and integrity.
3.Third plea in law, alleging the contested notice of competition circumvents the procedures provided by the Treaties to determine the rules governing the languages of the institutions of the European Union and the detailed rules for their application.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the European Union’s duty to respect its rich cultural and linguistic diversity and ensure that Europe’s cultural heritage is safeguarded and enhanced.
5.Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of the duty to state reasons.
(1) OJ 2022 C 233A, p. 1.