EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Alber delivered on 16 July 1998. # Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic. # Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Failure to transpose fully Directive 79/869/EEC. # Case C-229/97.

ECLI:EU:C:1998:381

61997CC0229

July 16, 1998
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Important legal notice

61997C0229

European Court reports 1998 Page I-06059

Opinion of the Advocate-General

A - Introduction

- declare that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply fully and correctly with Council Directive 79/869/EEC of 9 October 1979 concerning the methods of measurement and frequencies of sampling and analysis of surface water intended for the abstraction of drinking water in the Member States, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the third paragraph of Article 189 of the EC Treaty and the combined provisions of Article 13 of that directive, Article 395 of and Annex XXXVI to the Act of Accession, (2)

- in the alternative, declare that, by not informing the Commission of those measures forthwith, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions;

- order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

- allow until 30 October 1997 for the legislation improving and completing the transposition of Directive 79/869/EEC to be passed, and thereafter declare the case closed;

- order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

B - Analysis

3. Under Article 13 of Directive 79/869 the Member States were to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with that directive within two years of its notification and forthwith to inform the Commission thereof. Notification took place in October 1979.

4. Under the combined provisions of Article 395 of and Annex XXXVI(III)(5) to the Act of Accession, the Portuguese Republic had until 1 January 1989 to transpose the directive.

5. The Portuguese Republic adopted Decree-Law No 74/90 of 7 March 1990 to transpose the directive. However, the Commission takes the view that the directive was not fully and correctly transposed into Portuguese law. It considers that the Portuguese Republic did not fulfil its obligations deriving from Article 3(3) of the directive in conjunction with columns C, D and E of Annex I to the directive, Article 4(2) and Article 5 of the directive and footnote No 10 of Annex I to the directive.

Costs

Under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs.

C - Conclusion

10. I therefore propose that the Court should:

(1) declare that by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply fully and correctly with Council Directive 79/869/EEC of 9 October 1979 concerning the methods of measurement and frequencies of sampling and analysis of surface water intended for the abstraction of drinking water in the Member States, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the third paragraph of Article 189 of the EC Treaty and the combined provisions of Article 13 of that directive, Article 395 of and Annex XXXVI to the Act of Accession;

(2) order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs of the proceedings.

(1) - OJ 1979 L 271, p. 44.

(2) - OJ 1985 L 302, p. 397.

(3) - See Case C-361/95 Commission v Spain [1997] ECR I-7351, paragraphs 13 and 14, Case C-61/94 Commission v Germany [1996] ECR I-3989, paragraph 42, and Case C-123/94 Commission v Greece [1995] ECR I-1457, paragraph 7.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia