I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-306/19) (*)
(Action for annulment - Agricultural policy - Organic production - Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 - Production and labelling of organic products - Organic products imported into the European Union - Certification of products by a control body - No interest in bringing proceedings - Lack of direct concern - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2021/C 206/31)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Graanhandel P. van Schelven BV (Nieuwe-Tonge, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Almeida, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi, A. Dawes and B. Hofstötter, acting as Agents)
Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Article 1(3) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/446 of 19 March 2019 amending and correcting Regulation (EC) No 1235/2008 laying down detailed rules for implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 as regards the arrangements for imports of organic products from third countries (OJ 2019 L 77, p. 67), in so far as that provision, in conjunction with point 3 of Annex II to that implementing regulation, withdraws the recognition of Control Union Certifications as a competent body for carrying out controls and issuing certificates of inspection authorising the placing on the EU market, as organic products, of products imported from Kazakhstan, Moldova, Russia, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.There is no need to rule on the applications for measures of organisation of procedure and for the examination of witnesses submitted by Graanhandel P. van Schelven BV.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 280, 19.8.2019.