I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-139/07 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeals - Access to documents of the institutions - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to procedures for reviewing State aid - Exception concerning protection of the purposes of investigations - Duty of the institution concerned to carry out a concrete, individual examination of the content of the documents covered by the application for access)
2010/C 234/02
Language of the case: German
Appellant: European Commission (represented by: V. Kreuschitz, P. Aalto and C. Docksey, Agents)
Other parties to the proceedings: Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH (represented by C. Arhold and N. Wimmer, Rechtsanwälte), Republic of Finland (represented by J. Heliskoski, Agent), Kingdom of Sweden (represented by K. Wistrand, S. Johannesson and K. Petkovska, Agents)
Intervener in support of Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by B. Weis Fogh, Agent)
Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 14 December 2006 in Case T-237/02 Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau v Commission in which the Court of First Instance annulled the decision of the Commission of 28 May 2002 in so far as it refused to grant the applicant access to documents relating to the investigation procedures in respect of State aid granted to it — Application of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 to cases involving the investigation of State aid — Obligation of the institution concerned to undertake a specific and individual appraisal of the content of the documents referred to in the request for access
The Court:
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 140, 23.6.2007.