- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-150/22: Action brought on 21 March 2022 — Lilly Drogerie v EUIPO — Lillydoo (LILLYDOO kids)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0150
62022TN0150
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.5.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 198/59
(Case T-150/22)
(2022/C 198/84)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Lilly Drogerie d.o.o. Belgrade (Stari Grad) (Belgrade, Serbia) (represented by: E. Bojinova-Miller, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lillydoo GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark LILLYDOO kids — International registration designating the European Union No. 1 495 352
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 January 2022 in Joined Cases R 903/2021-2 and R 1298/2021-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in relation to the present action.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.