I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2023/C 223/47)
Language in which the application was lodged: French
Applicant: Sports et loisirs (Casal sport) (Altorf, France) (represented by: C. Pecnard, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tennis d’Aquitaine SAS (Ambares, France)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark CITY STADE in red and white colours — EU trade mark No 11 945 581.
Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 February 2023 in case R 179/2022-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and order the revocation of the EU trade mark CITY STADE No 11 945 581 in respect of all products;
—in the alternative, after annulment of the contested decision, remit the case to the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO;
—order the proprietor to pay the costs of this action, including the costs incurred in the proceedings before EUIPO.
Infringement of Article 58(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.