I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Appeal - Civil service - Interinstitutional transfer - Transfer application on the basis of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, submitted in response to a vacancy notice - Rejection of that application - Obligation to take account of the order of priority laid down in Article 29(1) of those regulations - Errors of law - Contradictory reasoning)
(C/2025/4123)
Language of the case: English
Appellant: ZR (represented by: A. Champetier and S. Rodrigues, avocats)
Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Lekan and A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agents)
The Court:
Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 29 March 2023, ZR v EUIPO (T-400/21, EU:T:2023:169);
Annuls the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 September 2020 rejecting the application made by ZR on 12 May 2020, by which she sought, in accordance with Articles 8 and 29 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, to be transferred to EUIPO;
Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by ZR in the present appeal and at first instance.
—
(1) OJ C, C/2023/309.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4123/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—