EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-416/12: Action brought on 20 September 2012 — HP Health Clubs Iberia v OHIM — Shiseido (ZENSATIONS)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TN0416

62012TN0416

September 20, 2012
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

17.11.2012

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/35

(Case T-416/12)

2012/C 355/73

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: HP Health Clubs Iberia, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: S. Serrat Viñas, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Shiseido Company Ltd (Tokyo, Japan)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 June 2012 in Case R 2212/2010-1;

reject the opposition brought by Shiseido Company Ltd;

refer the case back to OHIM for it to register the mark is respect of which registration was sought for all the contested services; and

order the defendant and the other party involved in the case to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in these proceedings and in the earlier proceedings before OHIM.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Community trade mark concerned: figurative mark ‘ZENSATIONS’ for services in Classes 35 and 44 — Community trade mark No 5 778 303

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Shiseido Company Ltd

Mark or sign cited in opposition: word mark ‘ZEN’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 21 and 44

Decision of the Opposition Division: opposition rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal: appeal upheld

Pleas in law:

Infringement of the second sentence of Article 75 and Article 76(1) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009;

Infringement of Article 8(2)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia