EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-92/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Ireland (Ireland) made on 17 February 2012 — Health Service Executive v SC, AC

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CN0092

62012CN0092

February 17, 2012
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

5.5.2012

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/18

(Case C-92/12)

2012/C 133/33

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Health Service Executive

Defendants: SC, AC

Questions referred

1.Does a judgment which provides for the detention of a child for a specified time in another Member State in an institution providing therapeutic and educational care come within the material scope of Council Regulation No 2201/2003?

2.If the answer to Question one is yes, what obligations, if any, arise out of Article 56 of Council Regulation No 2201/2003 as to the nature of the consultation and consent mechanism to ensure the effective protection of a child who is to be so detained?

3.Where a Court of a Member State has contemplated the placement of a child for a specified time in a residential care institution in another Member State and has obtained the consent of that State in accordance with Article 56 of Council Regulation 2201/2003, must the judgment of the court directing the placement of a child for a specified time in a residential care institution situated in another Member State be recognised and/or declared enforceable in that other Member State as a precondition to the placement being effected?

4.Does a judgment of the court directing the placement of the child for a specified time in a residential care institution situated in another Member State and which has been consented to by that Member State in accordance with Article 56 of Council Regulation 2201/2003 have any legal effect in that other Member State prior to the grant of a declaration of recognition and/or enforceability upon the completion of the proceedings seeking such declaration of recognition and/or enforceability?

5.Where a judgment of the court directing the placement of the child for a specified time in a residential care institution situated in another Member state under Article 56 of Council Regulation 2201/2003 is renewed for a further specified time must the Article 56 consent of the other Member State be obtained upon the occasion of each renewal?

6.Where a judgment of the court directing the placement of the child for a specified time in a residential care institution situated in another Member State under Article 56 of Council Regulation 2201/2003 is renewed for a further specified time must the judgment be recognised and/or enforced in that other Member State upon the occasion of each renewal?

(1) OJ L 338, p. 1

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia