- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-776/15: Action brought on 30 December 2015 — Meissen Keramik v OHIM (MEISSEN KERAMIK)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0776
62015TN0776
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.2.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 78/32
(Case T-776/15)
(2016/C 078/44)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Meissen Keramik GmbH (Meißen, Germany) (represented by: M. Vohwinkel and M. Bagh, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘MEISSEN KERAMIK’ — Application for registration No 13 100 797
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 October 2015 in Case R 531/2015-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.