EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-750/16: Action brought on 28 October 2016 — FV v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0750

62016TN0750

October 28, 2016
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

9.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/42

(Case T-750/16)

(2017/C 006/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: FV (Rhode-St-Genèse, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

declare the present action to be admissible and well-founded;

consequently:

annul the decision of 8 December 2015, taken on the basis of Article 42c of the Staff Regulations;

annul, as necessary, the decision of 19 July 2016 rejecting the applicant's complaint of 8 March 2016;

order the defendant to pay damages of EUR 151 101 subject to increase, as compensation for the pecuniary damage suffered by the applicant;

order the defendant to pay damages, set ex aequo et bono at EUR 70 000, as compensation for the non-pecuniary damage suffered by the applicant;

order the defendant to pay all of the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging a plea of illegality directed against Article 42c of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, infringement of Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, infringement of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16), and infringement of Article 1d of the Staff Regulations.

2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 42c of the Staff Regulations, infringement of the Communication to Staff No 71/15 to provide information on the implementation of Article 42c of the Staff Regulations, and manifest inaccuracies and irregularities in fact and in law of the grounds which would have led to the applicant’s compulsory leave;

3.Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to be heard and of the rights of the defence;

4.Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the duty of care;

5.Fifth plea in law, alleging misuse of powers.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia