- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-391/17: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — Romania v Commission (Law governing the institutions — European citizens’ initiative — Protection of national and linguistic minorities — Strengthening of cultural and linguistic diversity — Registration in part — Principle of conferral — Commission not manifestly lacking legislative powers — Obligation to state reasons — Article 5(2) TEU — Article 4(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 — Article 296 TFEU)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TA0391
62017TA0391
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 413/43
(Case T-391/17) (*)
(Law governing the institutions - European citizens’ initiative - Protection of national and linguistic minorities - Strengthening of cultural and linguistic diversity - Registration in part - Principle of conferral - Commission not manifestly lacking legislative powers - Obligation to state reasons - Article 5(2) TEU - Article 4(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 - Article 296 TFEU)
(2019/C 413/50)
Language of the case: Romanian
Parties
Applicant: Romania (represented initially by: R. Radu, C.-M. Florescu, E. Gane and L. Lițu, and subsequently by Florescu, Gane, Lițu and C.-R. Canțăr, acting as Agents)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Krämer, L. Radu Bouyon and H. Stancu, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Hungary (represented by: M. Fehér, G. Koós and G. Tornyai, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/652 of 29 March 2017 on the proposed citizens’ initiative entitled ‘Minority SafePack — one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ (OJ 2017 L 92, p. 100).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Romania to pay its own costs and those incurred by the Commission, including those relating to the interim proceedings;
3.Orders Hungary to bear its own costs.
(*) Language of the case: Romanian.