- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-851/19 P: Appeal brought on 19 November 2019 by DK against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 10 September 2019 in Case T-217/18 DK v EEAS
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0851
62019CN0851
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 68/30
—
(Case C-851/19 P)
(2020/C 68/32)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: DK (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, avocats)
Other party to the proceedings: European External Action Service
Form of order sought
The appellant submits that the Court of Justice should:
—set aside the judgment of 10 September 2019 in DK v EEAS (T-217/18);
—annul the decision of 23 May 2017 imposing a disciplinary measure on the appellant;
—order the EEAS to pay the costs of both sets of proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The appellant asks the Court to set aside the judgment of 10 September 2019 (T-217/18), in which the General Court dismissed his action for annulment and ordered him to pay the costs.
In that regard, the appellant raises a single ground of appeal, alleging an error of law (paragraphs 28 to 53 of the judgment under appeal), in so far as the General Court interpreted Article 10(b) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations as allowing damage in respect of which compensation has already been paid to be taken into account in order to justify imposing a stricter disciplinary measure on a civil servant as compared to the measure recommended by the Disciplinary Committee.
—