- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 February 2009. # MPDV Mikrolab GmbH, Mikroprozessordatenverarbeitung und Mikroprozessorlabor v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1)(c) - Refusal of registration - Word mark ‘manufacturing score card’ - Descriptive character. # Case C-17/08 P.
ECLI:EU:C:2009:64
62008CO0017
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C‑17/08 P)
Appeal – Community trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Article 7(1)(c) – Refusal of registration – Word mark ‘manufacturing score card’ – Descriptive character
Appeals – Grounds – Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 225 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 27)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 8 November 2007 in Case T-459/05 MPDV Mikrolab v OHIM (manufacturing score card), by which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action for annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 October 2005, which rejected the appeal against the decision of the examiner refusing registration of the word mark ‘manufacturing score card’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 35 and 42 – Distinctive character of a word mark consisting of words each of which is descriptive of the characteristics of the goods or services concerned.
Operative part
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.MPDV Mikrolab GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.