EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-596/23, Pohjanri: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 December 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hallinto-oikeus – Finland) – proceedings brought by B UG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 36(1) – Online purchase of excise goods in another Member State – Transport by a transporter recommended by the vendor – National rules regarding the vendor as liable for the excise duties chargeable in the Member State of destination)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0596

62023CA0596

December 19, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/1206

(Case C-596/23, (1) Pohjanri) (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Excise duties - Directive 2008/118/EC - Article 36(1) - Online purchase of excise goods in another Member State - Transport by a transporter recommended by the vendor - National rules regarding the vendor as liable for the excise duties chargeable in the Member State of destination)

(C/2025/1206)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: B UG

Other party to the proceedings: Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö

Operative part of the judgment

Article 36(1) of Council Directive 2008/118/EC of 16 December 2008 concerning the general arrangements for excise duty and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC

must be interpreted as meaning that in the situations referred to in that provision, excise goods must be regarded as ‘dispatched or transported to another Member State directly or indirectly by the vendor or on his behalf’, such that that vendor is liable for excise duty in that other Member State, where he or she acts in such a way as to guide the purchaser’s choice of the company responsible for the dispatch and/or transport of those goods by suggesting and facilitating the use of certain companies that can be responsible for that.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1206/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

(1) OJ C C/2023/1133.

(2) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia