I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2017/C 330/23)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Next design+produktion GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: M. Hirsch, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany)
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Representation of ‘nuuna’) — Application for registration No 10 772 606
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 May 2017 in Case R 1448/2016-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 May 2017;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 1(1) Regulation No 207/2009 and of the principle of autonomy;
—Infringement of the principles of legal certainty, legality and sound administration.