- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-587/24: Action brought on 14 November 2024 – GE v Eurojust and Europol
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0587
62024TN0587
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/197
13.1.2025
(Case T-587/24)
(C/2025/197)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: GE (represented by: J. Reisinger, lawyer)
Defendants: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation, European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Determine and/or declare that the contested actions of Europol and/or Eurojust in context of the SKY ECC operation are in violation of EU law, and, furthermore, of Treaties, with the aim of awarding the applicant compensation under Articles 268, 277 and 340 of the TFEU, Article 50 of Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and replacing and repealing Council Decisions 2009/371/JHA, 2009/934/JHA, 2009/935/JHA, 2009/936/JHA and 2009/968/JHA (and Regulation (EU) 2022/991 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2022 amending Regulation (EU) 2016/794, as regards Europol’s cooperation with private parties, the processing of personal data by Europol in support of criminal investigations, and Europol’s role in research and innovation), and Article 47 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 on the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust), and replacing and repealing Council Decision 2002/187/JHA;
—Award the applicant compensation of EUR 15,000 pursuant to Article 268 TFEU in conjunction with Article 340 TFEU;
—Order the defendants to pay the legal costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging the breach by Europol and/or Eurojust’s of the applicant’s right to a fair trial.
2.Second plea in law, alleging illegality and disproportionality in the acquisition and processing of data/personal data.
3.Third plea in law, alleging lack of possibility to assess the admissibility of evidence in criminal cases, or at least the lack of formal and substantive safeguards.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging lack of (proven) adequate security in the acquisition and processing of the Sky ECC data.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/197/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—