- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-381/14: Action brought on 30 May 2014 — Pshonka v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0381
62014TN0381
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.8.2014
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 261/38
(Case T-381/14)
2014/C 261/63
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: C. Constantina and J.-M. Reymond, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—partially annul, on the basis of Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP of 5 March 2014 and Council Regulation No 208/2014 of 5 March 2014, insofar as they concern the applicant and, more specifically, order:
—to remove the applicant’s name from Annex I of the Council Regulation N. 208/2014 of 5 March 2014;
—to remove the applicant’s name from Annex I of the Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP of 5 March 2014;
—partially annul, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP of 5 March 2014 and Council Regulation No 208/2014 of 5 March 2014, insofar as they do not conform to the Joint Proposal;
—order the Council to bear the costs of this suit and award costs to the applicant.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-380/14, Pshonka v Council.