I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
((Community trade mark - International registration designating the European Community - Word mark IDIRECT24 - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2015/C 346/30)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: iNET24 Holding AG (Feusisberg, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Kirschstein-Freund, B. Breitinger and V. Dalichau, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (trade marks and designs) (represented by: initially by A. Pohlmann and S. Hanne, acting as Agents)
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 February 2014 (Case R 1867/2013-5), concerning the international registration designating the European Community of word mark IDIRECT24.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders iNET24 Holding AG to pay the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2015346EN.01002601-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2015346EN.01002601-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 184, 16.6.2014.