- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-591/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 11 November 2020 — Reprensus GmbH v S-V Pavlovi Trejd EOOD
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CN0591
62020CN0591
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 35/32
(Case C-591/20)
(2021/C 35/44)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant and appellant in the appeal on a point of law: Reprensus GmbH
Defendant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: S-V Pavlovi Trejd EOOD
Question referred
Are points 1(a) and 2 of Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (1) (OJ 2012 L 351) to be interpreted as meaning that jurisdiction for matters relating to tort or delict exists in respect of an action for damages if the applicant was induced to conclude a purchase contract and pay the purchase price by means of intentional deception?
(1) OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1.