- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-668/22: Action brought on 21 October 2022 — European Commission v Slovak Republic
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0668
62022CN0668
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.12.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 463/21
(Case C-668/22)
(2022/C 463/28)
Language of the case: Slovak
Parties
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: B. Sasinowska, G. Wilms and R. Lindenthal, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Slovak Republic
Form of order sought
—declare that, by failing to take the measures necessary to achieve certain results resulting from Commission Regulation (EC) No 29/2009 (1) of 16 January 2009 laying down requirements on data link services for the single European sky, the Slovak Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(3) TEU in conjunction with Article 3(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 29/2009;
—order the Slovak Republic to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Pursuant to Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 29/2009, ATS providers are to ensure that ATS units providing air traffic services within the airspace referred to in Article 1(3) of that regulation are capable of providing and operating data link services as defined in Annex II to that regulation. The data services defined in Annex II are: data link initiation capability (DLIC), ATC communication management (ACM) service, ATC clearance and information (ACL) service and ATC microphone control (AMC) service. Contrary to Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 29/2009, the ATS provider entrusted by the Slovak Republic has not ensured that ATS units are capable of providing and operating the data link services defined in Annex II to that regulation. The Slovak Republic, within the meaning of Article 4(3) of the EU Treaty, had not, at the time of the expiry of the time limit in its reasoned opinion, taken the necessary measures to ensure that the ATS provider entrusted by it complies with the requirements of Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 29/2009.
(1) OJ 2009 L 13, p. 3.