- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-83/21: Judgment of the General Court of 12 October 2022 — Van Walle v ECDC (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — ECDC staff members — Decision not to renew a contract — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Right to be heard — Action for annulment and for damages)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0083
62021TA0083
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.12.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 463/26
(Case T-83/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - ECDC staff members - Decision not to renew a contract - Manifest error of assessment - Misuse of powers - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Right to be heard - Action for annulment and for damages)
(2022/C 463/35)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Ivo Van Walle (Järfälla, Sweden) (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (represented by: J. Mannheim, acting as Agent, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
Re:
By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in the first place, annulment of the decision of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) of 30 March 2020 not to renew his contract as a member of the temporary staff; in the second place, principally, an order that ECDC pay him retroactively the net salary of which he was deprived between the non-renewal of his contract and the date of his reinstatement and, in the alternative, an order that ECDC compensate him for the material damage that he allegedly suffered; and, in the third place, compensation for the non-material damage that he allegedly suffered following the decision not to renew his contract.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Ivo Van Walle to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 48, 26.4.2021.