- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-231/22: Action brought on 28 April 2022 — Growth Finance Plus v EUIPO (doglover)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0231
62022TN0231
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 237/69
(Case T-231/22)
(2022/C 237/89)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Growth Finance Plus AG (Gommiswald, Switzerland) (represented by: H. Twelmeier, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU word mark doglover — Application No 18 107 487
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 February 2022 in Case R 720/2020-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.