I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
((Action for annulment - Customs union - Commission letter informing about the continuation of the suspension of the time-limit for dealing with an application for remission of customs duties - Application for a ruling - Lack of competence of the General Court - No interest in bringing proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2015/C 056/26)
Language of the case: Dutch
Applicant: Firma Léon Van Parys (Antwerp, Belgium) (represented by: P. Vlaemminck, B. Van Vooren and R. Verbeke, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Caeiros, B.-R. Killmann and M. van Beek, acting as Agents)
First, application for annulment of the letter of the European Commission of 24 January 2014 informing the applicant about the continuation of the suspension of the time-limit for dealing with an application for remission of customs duties under Article 907 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1993 L 253, p. 1) and, secondly, application for a ruling that Article 909 of Regulation No 2454/93 had effect with regard to the applicant after the judgment of 19 March 2013 in Firma Van Parys v Commission (T-324/10, ECR, EU:T:2013:136).
1.The application is dismissed;
2.Firma Léon Van Parys is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.
(1)
OJ C 151, 19.5.2014.