- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-363/08: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — 2nine v OHIM — Pacific Sunwear of California (nollie) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark nollie — Earlier national and international word marks NOLI — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity between the goods — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Article 74(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TA0363
62008TA0363
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.5.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 134/31
(Case T-363/08)(<a id="ntc1-C_2010134EN.01003102-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2010134EN.01003102-E0001"> (<span class="super">1</span>)</a>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark nollie - Earlier national and international word marks NOLI - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity between the goods - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Article 74(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))
2010/C 134/52
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: 2nine Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Palmer, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. (Anaheim, California, United States)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 June 2008 (Case R 1590/2007-2), relating to opposition proceedings between 2nine Ltd and Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders 2nine Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
(<a id="ntr1-C_2010134EN.01003102-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2010134EN.01003102-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> <a href="./../../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2008:272:TOC">OJ C 272, 25.10.2008</a>.)